Comments for Action Engineering

Comment on What is a Digital Twin? by Scott Smith

Scott Smith — Tue, 09 Nov 2021 22:36:12 +0000

I am working on digital triplets. MBSE + MBD + Physical Product…

Comment on What is a Digital Twin? by Action Engineering

Action Engineering — Tue, 25 May 2021 17:10:02 +0000

In reply to john kelley. Thanks for your response, it's great to see people engaging with this important term! Terminology is definitely one of the challenges in making these big sea change transitions, and the more we reflect critically on them as a community, the better the transitions can be communicated and implemented.

Comment on What is a Digital Twin? by john kelley

john kelley — Mon, 24 May 2021 15:21:38 +0000

I’ve been using the term Design digital twin and Operations digital twin (the true digital twin). Not sure you can win the battle against everyone calling everything digital a twin

Comment on 3D CIC: Home Edition – CAD Hackathon with Sigmetrix by Jennifer Herron

Jennifer Herron — Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:30:08 +0000

In reply to Patrick Wabwire. Thanks for watching Patrick! Glad you could tune-in.

Comment on 3D CIC: Home Edition – CAD Hackathon with Sigmetrix by Patrick Wabwire

Patrick Wabwire — Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:20:18 +0000

Just watched the hackathon. I was not able to submit because my CAD software is unable to annotate the way that was needed to properly define the designs. Excellent review by the presenters. The functional approach in datum feature assignment as opposed to Inspection view of datums was a highlight for me. Thank you for the hackathon. Please do more of these type of events. Looking forward to Sigmetrix tolerance analysis of the design. Some comments on the proposed solution. How practical is the position callout of secondary datum feature B back to A? Would a parallel callout have been more practical since there are not enough reference for an origin of measurement. I can see position for a tertiary datum feature in this case. Also one of the proposed models had a radius with tolerances directly called out. Since a radius is not a feature of size, having no opposed ends to reliably generate an axis, I would have expected a basic radius dimension and profile tolerance back to the DRF to control its variation. Great session overall

Comment on Happy Holidays from the Action team! by Action Engineering

Action Engineering — Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:12:22 +0000

In reply to Brad White. Thanks Brad, we hope you had a wonderful holiday season!

Comment on Happy Holidays from the Action team! by Brad White

Brad White — Wed, 23 Dec 2020 19:39:38 +0000

Fantastic Photos! Looking forward to next year and the possibilities it brings.

Comment on GD&T Master Class: Sept 29 & Oct 1, 2020 by Action Engineering

Action Engineering — Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:27:22 +0000

In reply to Ed McCarthy.

Hello Ed,

The first session is September 29th and the following session is October 1st. I hope you can join us!

Warm regards,
Kate Hubbard
Action Engineering

Comment on GD&T Master Class: Sept 29 & Oct 1, 2020 by Ed McCarthy

Ed McCarthy — Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:21:34 +0000

There are two different dates for the first session. Is it Sept. 28 or Sept 29??

Comment on Beginner’s Guide to QIF Implementation by Bob Stone, DMSC by Action Engineering

Action Engineering — Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:07:16 +0000

In reply to Dave Wang.

Hi Dave,

I would recommend reaching out to Bob on LinkedIn to see if he may be able to assist with your request: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bob-stone-9419444/

Best,
Kate Hubbard
Action Engineering